
Staff Assembly Meeting Minutes
October 7, 2003
Members
Attending: Chris
Arreguin, Ruben Ayala, McLeod Baker, Lois Biege, Gay Boydston, Jonathan Brown,
Emily Burgwyn, Alice Carter, Randy Cobb, Carlene Coover, Brad Davis, Dan Dehart,
Kay Edmondson, Craig Elders, Marilyn Eudaly, Roger Fisher, Ervey Garcia, Rebecca
Glass, Mesina Gray, David Grebel, Nancy Grieser, Josh Harmon, Dorothy Holland,
John Householder, Pam Hughes, Mary Kaszynski, Joe Laster, Tommy Love, Debbie
Mar, Valeria McDougle, Amy McDurham, Kevin O’Connell, Gabriel Perez, Tara
Pope, Barbara Savak, Donna Shepherd, Emily Sullivan, Tracy Syler-Doctson, Darron
Turner, Robert Vann, Shawn Wagner, Esco Weatherspoon, Paula Work, David Yale,
and Richard Yantis.
Guests:
Chancellor
Victor Boschini, Vice Chancellor Carol Campbell, Associate Vice Chancellor for
Human Resources John Weis, and Skiff reporter Megan Youker.
Members
Absent: Ross
Bailey, Karen Baker, John Butler, Jackie Callanan, Nancy Carter, Rocio Garcia,
Julie Graver, Sharon Hudson, Mary Lane, Maria Leyva, Melinda Rubenkoenig,
DeVonna Tinney, Hao Tran, and Juan Varela.
Welcome:
The meeting was called to order at 3:33 p.m. by chair David Grebel.
Minutes:
The September minutes were approved as
submitted.
Announcements:
Staff members are encouraged to participate in Reading Frogs.
For more information or to sign up, contact Mary Lane at ext. 7663 or m.lane@tcu.edu.
Josh
Harmon announced that the new-and-improved portal, my.tcu.edu, will be
introduced on Oct. 20.
David
Grebel serves on the committee searching for the new Provost.
The committee has begun gathering information and establishing criteria
for the search.
Presentation:
Carol Campbell, Vice Chancellor for
Finance and Administration, told the Staff Assembly about the operating budget.
Revenue was $225 million in 2002-03, and $230 million is projected for
2003-04. Most of the increase in
operating revenue is from increases in student tuition.
TCU is still inexpensive compared to its peers, so there is room for
increasing tuition. However, recent
increases have been steep and there is concern about how much tuition can
continue to be raised.
There
will be significant pressure on the budget in upcoming years because earnings
from the endowment are down. A
percentage of the endowment contributes to TCU’s operating revenue.
The figure is calculated based on a trailing 12-quarter average.
In the past the endowment was usually stable or up, which increased the
amount contributed to the budget. But
the endowment peaked in spring 2000, so recent quarterly averages have been
down. It is anticipated that there
will be $5 million less from the endowment to support the 2004-05 budget than in
2003-04, although that figure is tentative because only 10 of the 12 quarters
are yet known.
The
expenditures in the budget have been categorized according to TCU’s level of
control:
no
discretion over 60% of the costs (depreciation, interest, amortization, new
building operations, utilities, insurance, post-retirement benefits, and
worker’s compensation),
little
discretion over 34% of the costs (tuition-adjusted financial aid and fringe
benefits, especially health care), and
full
discretion over 6% of the costs (salary raise pool, retirement equalization,
programs and contingency).
In
other words, TCU has decision-making ability about how to spend a small part of
the budget.
Several
questions were raised about employee benefits.
Campbell recognized Staff Assembly members’ concerns about eliminating
the benefit to allow dependents to attend other schools, and she will forward
these concerns to the administration. Chancellor
Boschini reminded the Staff Assembly that we must always remember the long-term
picture and do what is beneficial for TCU.
He mentioned that he and Campbell are both very concerned with expenses
throughout the university and are not targeting employee benefits only.
Committee
Reports: Darron
Turner, chair of the Policy Review Committee, presented some figures about the
tuition benefit program:
79
employees and 207 dependents attend TCU under the tuition assistance
benefit;
30
dependent children who did not meet TCU admissions standards attend other
Texas institutions (12 are students of color);
Under
the Tuition Exchange Program, 16 dependent children attend other
institutions and 19 from other institutions attend TCU.
The
committee felt that many dependents who did not meet TCU admissions standards as
freshmen would benefit from attending a community college, so they proposed the
following resolution:
We recommend that Staff Assembly support the recommendations of the RIB Committee and that the following change be recommended: Students who do not gain admission to TCU are eligible to receive tuition benefits to attend Tarrant County College for up to two years, but they must reapply annually to TCU for admission.
Randy Cobb recommended
amending the motion to read that students may attend Tarrant County College or
their local community college and that they may (rather than must)
reapply to TCU. The amendment
passed.
Bob Vann recommended
amending the motion to eliminate Tarrant County College from the
resolution and state only that the dependents could attend their local community
college. The amendment failed.
As amended, the resolution
considered by the Staff Assembly read:
We recommend that the Staff Assembly support the recommendation of the RIB Committee and that the following benefit be recommended: Students who do not gain admission to TCU are eligible to receive tuition benefits to attend Tarrant County College or their local community college for up to two years, but they may reapply annually to TCU for admission.
The resolution passed and
will be forwarded to the administration.
Roger
Fisher pointed out that the Retirement, Insurance and Benefits Committee, a
university committee, amended their resolution to encourage TCU to pay for
tuition at a local community college and stated that dependents may apply
rather than must apply to TCU.
It
was clarified from the previous meeting that dependents may participate in the
Tuition Exchange Program regardless of if they are admitted to TCU.
The Tuition Exchange Program is not affected by the proposed change in
benefits.
David
Grebel reported that the priorities suggested at the September meeting were for
the Staff Assembly to work on issues related to wages and benefits.
More information will be forthcoming.
New
Business: Joe
Laster asked about the Staff Assembly’s budget.
David Grebel will share the budget with Staff Assembly members.
Several
members throughout the meeting asked about other ways in which costs were being
cut. They felt that letting
employees know that benefits was not the only area being cut would help
“lessen the pain.” They also
want to know how employees can share cost-cutting ideas with the administration.
Carlene Coover pointed out that there is a form on the Staff Assembly
website http://www.staffassembly.tcu.edu/comments.htm
to submit suggestions. Employees
who want to remain anonymous may submit suggestions to David Grebel, who will
forward them anonymously. Carol
Campbell said that a program is being developed to help employees forward
suggestions, but in the meantime to send suggestions through the Staff Assembly
website or through Grebel.
Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned at 4:47 p.m.